[ home ] [ bs / meta / archive / spook ] [ dashboard ]
You have 0 unread Private Message(s)! View Inbox

/bs/ - backstory

reminds me of the time i was staffas
Posting mode: Reply [Return] [Go to bottom]
Name
Email
Subject
Comment
Verification Security Check: URL detected. Solve to post.

Select File / Embed / Oekaki
File
Embed
Oekaki [Oekaki logic integrated]
Password

[-]

File: 1789332236444.png (11.02 KB, 500x500, 1763161476446799.png)

  No. 298458 [PM]

maybe i shouldn't be hitler and nazi sympathetic. they had pretty grim plans for russians, and all my friends r russian, and i'm 1/8 russian too. so i feel bit awkward every time i post some nazi stuff

  No. 298459 [PM]

File: 1789332549700.mp4 (1.12 MB, 768x1024, 174657556.mp4)


  No. 298460 [PM]

how can you be Bulgarian and call your band Aryan Art lmao :DDD

  No. 298463 [PM]

File: 1789333248163.jpg (61.87 KB, 1280x720, 1789102398303505.jpg)


  No. 298476 [PM]

Dunno, Nazis had grim plans for everyone who isnt German. Or Germanic, any way, there was some race hierarchy but there was no question that whole world, whole planet must be German

In propaganda they mostly lambasted the enemy of the day, but they had really low opinions about anyone who isnt German, fully German not part German or watever. Nazi party wasnt divided about mischlinge, they must be sterilized, but they were divided on how they must be treated

Basically, Nazi race laws were really restrictive and actually would made a lot of Germans in Germany mischlinge. Not to say the disabled and mentally ill, those werent seen as human even if they are German

Any way, ayran race is a mystical concept and it pains me to know dat a Russian has created it. Nazism was esoteric, it referred to otherworld evil(jews) as the root of all problem and then used mystical race purity as explanation why Germans are so great. It cannot be understood without first knowing that Weimar was a kinda socialist democratic state and that it failed miserably because of conservatives. Germans really resented losing war, but more than dat, they resented the wall street crash because now not only that theyve lost and must pay reparations, economy is mismanaged and nothing works at all. Nazis played on those two sentiments and their ideology was built around them in this way

Thing about race and jew hatred is mostly Hitler thing. Though, Nazi party 100% agreed. Yeah, Hitler read Theosophy(at dat time in Vienna esoteric was fashionable so everyone read it. Vienna was intensely anti jew and perhaps esoterism is part of why)

  No. 298477 [PM]

>>298476
(Hitler wasnt really an esoteric. He was when he was young, but in Germany he held view that strongest is rightest. So race policies, while esoteric, were supported by Hitler because he believed Germans to be above any other people by right, because of Providence. Wat is Providence? It means that Hitler was choosen by God to lead German race into world hegemony. He refered to Providence quite a lot. So? Hitler thought that other races must be annihilated because they are unpure and not fit for survival. So, actually, it meant dat if Germans to lose second world war, that it was Germans who were weak. And Hitler come to resent Germans in the last months of 1945 because he thought Germans werent cruel to his enemies enough and allowed Jews some place to exist and dat was big mistake in his mind. So, yeah, dont be mistaken: Nazi race laws benefited Germans, but many of those Germans had to suffer immensely. It is self destruction, but was called purification, cleansing, to mask it)

  No. 298478 [PM]

>>298477
hitler is just young sensitive man who hated jews because they are evil

himmler on the other hand, he is real schizo esoteric nigga

  No. 298479 [PM]

>>298478
Sure, thats true with the exception that I wouldnt call Hitler young and sensitive and man. He was short of a man, highly complexed beast, and virulently psychopathic egomaniac that couldnt make deep human connections even with secret girlfriend. He was a lunatic, in short, but he wasnt dumb as they say

  No. 298480 [PM]

Blonde hair and blue eyes
Dw about it you'd be prime ss twink material

  No. 298558 [PM]

File: 1789404970176.jpg (515.14 KB, 733x957, 1737982812200195.jpg)

>>298476
yeh i don't think they would have allowed greater finland to exist forever. even if at the time they had sympathetic propaganda. eventually they would probably have forced further importation of some german aristocracy and merchant class alongside the swedish ones, w/ gradual loss of rights and reduction to serfdom for finns, and eventual deportation to urals or something. tho not sure. in this kind of hypothetical future there'd be lot of other euro countries on the chopping block b4 finlan, which may just not have been tenable. germans were very overextended in europ already, and all the kill 50 locals for every german occupier killed stuff wasn't working. so it's lot of wat ifs b4. they'd have to breed like crazy and by the time it was possible they probably wouldn't have equally schizo leader (think hitler was supposed to be last one w/ führer title). maybe would have transitioned to some just white nationalistic policy (tho w/ still german elite) after turning focus elsewhere from europ

tho they were bit schizo about wats german. at the time in europ w/o genetics it was more just language based, tho there were some other vague indications too. it wasn't one drop rule like in usa or something, where ur tracking some octoroons carefully. anything less than quarter mischling was still acceptable. it wouldn't have been realistic to be too anal about it, other than @ some special instances like the lebensborn stuff and ss officer selection
>>298477
i haven't red mein kampf yet or that much history about it in general. but yeh he was pretty bitter and resentful @ germans in the end
>>298480
so are many russians and other slavs genius

  No. 298560 [PM]

you being a russian is like 1 out of 4 reasons they would have put you in a camp after you never having worked a day in your live, you having questionable bone density and you being bisexual/genderfluid

  No. 298562 [PM]

>>298560
not really talking about myself. i don't think i would personally have had it that bad. tho i (nor any1 else here) just wouldn't have existed bc butterfly effect

>bisexual

really no1 cares about that, it's so fucking normal
the scrutiny is more on those from who it's obvious. like u can tell a faggy gay from a mile away no matter how hard he tries to mask it. and even then they'd probably be tolerated as long as they didn't act on it (tho much more scrutiny on them than on some normal guys having some rando gay experience w/ for a few weeks during teenage years)

i obv would have gone to highschool and conscription and uni and gotten employed etc if i was born in german europe. in this society i just saw it's possible to become a scholar even w/o rich parents and went for it. tho i obv failed and mostly just watched anime and masturbated instead of becoming renaissance man. i initially chose to be neet, tho which yes gradually caused some other degenerate behaviour

  No. 298568 [PM]

>>298560
Typical German retard
Remember when they beat you and sent all germans to camps and not made the best German country

  No. 298569 [PM]

>>298558
Hey idiot
You're smart and also a twink dinner for people
You will be a cum rag in the reich

  No. 298657 [PM]

File: 1789442764486-0.jpg (407.72 KB, 1448x2048, g_14577433 - 5ae8f3f197529….jpg)

>>298558
I dunno, those theories are far too sympathetic to the Nazi regime and far too positive for a country in which a father could choose to euthanize own child if they considered "defective"

Nazis wanted to take the best land in Europe and put German(TEVTONIC) farmers on it. Then arm them with guns(most germans served in army), and in this way theyll build a wall against "Asiatic hordes". So, yeah, locals(some of them) would still exist in their gaue but it would be as minimal as possible. Nazi strategy was a slow genocide, they thought that weaker races will just die out, and they werent scrupulous about the means of how achieving it. Practically, they knew dat you cant just put people in one place and expect population to shirnk, so, wat they wanted is to displace the population, scatter people all around, and then "discourage" natives from procreating, by using police of course

Hitler not on one occasion called for Germans to birth more children, mostly related to world war 2. But actually, population wasnt a problem for Germany, Nazis only wanted the best land in Ukraine, Crimea, and all else was basically if Germans wanted to live there, then the Nazi state will make it so

Also, most native gaue would be under civilian administration. This meant that it would be run by natives sympathetic to Nazis. The party would be, of course, controlling the administration. The civilian administration has no conttol over police or local SS, (control structure is not easily explainable), so it did imply that natives would, in limited numbers, live in their gaue. However, they would not get much development. Nazis planned for those cities, if you can call them that, to be somewat between a ghetto and a provincial city

As for "race" "science", I dont know much, but it was dumb as hell and Germans did not like it. Any way, Nazi imagining of the future is devoid of any joy or life. It is a constant war, against jews and degeneracy. So, Good Bevensen is right, it was extremely easy to end up in a camp

  No. 298658 [PM]

File: 1789444121546-0.jpg (465.9 KB, 1157x1762, g_14631449 - 111b429aceaf0….jpg)

>>298657
(Why some natives must remain? Because of hard labour. German plans were quite clear, because of the war they desperately needed the resources. Thats why the Reich must expand, to get safety, which is the key word, for German race. And so, natives will be kept to work in coalmines and places where Germans must not. Practically as a relief for two wars. So, they came up with labour camps exactly for this reason, to extract recources to fuel further expansion of the lebensraum. So, working natives to death is one way of eventually making natives extinct. Not completely I guess, they needed slaves to work in coalmines, so wat they imagined is mini general govrrnment in native gaue I guess, anus mundi so to say)

  No. 298662 [PM]

File: 1789449021105-0.png (2.01 MB, 1712x1280, Screenshot 2026-09-15 at 0….png)

File: 1789449021105-1.jpg (212.01 KB, 1144x1605, 1782274830984549.jpg)

File: 1789449021105-2.jpg (138.78 KB, 1179x1212, 1777414307078490.jpg)

>>298657
>for a country in which a father could choose to euthanize own child if they considered "defective"
dats not morally so different to wat we have now w/ abortion and euthanasia. or some of the stuff liberal countries like sweden did ~40 years ago (sterilisation of poor and handicapped ppl etc). or 10s of thousands of black babies being aborted in usa every year. germany also had to stop aktion-t4 etc bc public outcry, or make it much more hidden. these aren't same thing, but they're comparable enough that being irredeemably appalled by only one is weird

  No. 298668 [PM]

File: 1789450161124-0.jpg (847.02 KB, 2276x4096, g_14714254 - 6ba41a176a499….jpg)

>>298662
>>298662
There is a case for voluntary euthanasia, as in old age when nothing can be done with physical pain, but even then it is voluntary euthanasia

In Nazy Germany, did all those kids and not so kids who were considered by own Nazi fathers to be defective choose voluntarily to die? No. Germans were terrified by t4, especially Catholics, its inhumanity was plain as day

In western countries, choice is sacred. So by this logic, any involuntary killing is immoral. Thats why there is a huge difference between t4 and modern liberal approach to euthanasia, today nothing is done without consent and if it is done, then it is indeed dubious and inhumane

So, yes, any form of euthanasia is a form of eugenics. No exceptions. My own opinion is that unless pain for someone is too great to live no one should assist them with death, it is not a government's matter to assist in killing of any one. So, yes, European countries are still eugenic and eugenics is still popular, thats right. However, today, eugenics are done out of liberal considerations, which doesnt make them less appaling indeed

(So, eugenics are appaling everywhere, not just Nazi Germany. Eugenics arent particularly a Nazi thing, its just Nazis were particularly cruel to humans)

  No. 298671 [PM]

File: 1789452377461.png (653.83 KB, 800x1200, 1770269201195.png)

>>298668
when will u get on animol rights and that killing billions of cows and pigs and chicken every year for irrational reasons is appalling

  No. 298672 [PM]

File: 1789452485874.png (963.36 KB, 1280x720, 1718919857743.png)

sorry i'm tubed and unable to properly engage long messages

  No. 298676 [PM]

File: 1789454144061-0.jpg (714.2 KB, 2607x4096, g_14763039 - 3840f87d27866….jpg)

>>298671
It is way difficult to say. Animals cant have rights so long they dont fight for it, so, agitation for animal rights is an upper class morality sport and has no thing to do to promote welfare of all life

I feel for cow and chicken and pig. I dont believe dat they should be kept in cruel conditions. But all people will agree that human life matters more for humans. No one wants to be called inhumane

So, should be industrial slaughter be stopped? Very difficult to say. Today, people can eat meat in reasonable quantities, though quality of it is not so great. Isnt this wonderful? That parents can see their children be raised in good conditions? How can this be achieved without cruelty? It cannot, with the current organization of production

Animals and bug are cool. Back in old time when there were only gatherer hunters, hunters too pitied their pray even though it was just natural for them. And today, most hunters are reasonably humane(in a good sense) towards animals. So long they are arent upper class trophy hunters or poachers or watever. While they do take life of other being, they at least respect it. Which is a huge deal. So, hunting as a form of getting food is not really cruel. It is the industrial slaughter that is without a doubt cruel. It is a fact of life that we must slaughter living beings to continue living ourselves. And best we can do is to respect those living beings, and that goes a long way

So, if you are vegan, then I respect you. But if you condemn other people for eating meat, I cannot respect you for that you condemn ordinary people for doing wat theyve always did, you condemn them for not sharing your upper class morality when theyve never could share it. I dislike intolerance in any form
>>298672
Since when?

  No. 298678 [PM]

File: 1789456148805.png (357.71 KB, 735x737, 1737950469220650.png)

>>298676
>It is a fact of life that we must slaughter living beings to continue living ourselves
don't think that's tru. we can synthetise all the stuff not found from plants in sufficent quantities. being vegan takes effort, but if it was societal goal it would be lot easier for the individual

i'm not vegan, tho i respect them, and accept their anger and loathing @ me and other meat eaters
>Since when?
wel since i haven't been replying properly, so on and off for past few years

i don't know wats the issue exactyl. i always blamed imageboards, but maybe it's also me being bullied online here and on mint, which even if i don't consciously think anything about, probably has some subconscious anxious effect which aggravates it. it's also just not satisfying here, which maybe increases number of times i have to f5 per day. i've noticed only times it has been satisfying is when i take the effort to reply to long message, like it's night and day difference, but they require more initial mental energy than i have rn

physically health wise i'm doing pretty well, exercise, diet, oral hygiene, skin, humidity, better sleep, no caffeine or nicotine, supplements, fiber, not deficient in anything etc, but mentally i'm still low attention span. well, quitting internet does work, but it's so lame how often i do it and then change mind after few days

  No. 298681 [PM]

File: 1789461388136-0.jpg (234.05 KB, 1437x2107, g_14802204 - d51b4ea179242….jpg)

>>298678
Who are we, exactly? Can ordinary guy synthesize meat in kitchen? No. So long a guy in own kitchen cant do it we have to. If it is possible to make all meat factories some lab grown meat, sure, that would be cool. But it is impractical and too costly for the capitalists. Otherwise they wouldve already switched

Lab grown meat is a tech utopian fantasy. Even if grown meat could be mass available, people would still prefer animal meat. And they are not wrong in that. Why should ordinary guy take any condemnation from someone who has time and money and power not to eat meat? Not eating meat is a luxury, not available to little guy, however paradoxical that might sound

I dunno. Attention span will be short if you dont know wat exactly you are supposed to give your attention to. Maybe dats all the problem, any way, no thing gonna help if you just dont feel like it

I dunno. If you dont feel like writing long texts, or feel like you cant or dont want, then you are correct in dat. I guess you have to have confidence in wat you say and interest, and then you can write plenty. People really struggle with writing about something not interesting to them or about which they dont really know about

Eh, I dont want to open this site sometimes. When I write long text, especially. It just too big of a hassle… I can write long text about every thing but it is always weird because I just try to find a way to make it more interesting to me, and dat is how it is so long. Though, I tend not to ask questions, so my posts are monologs mostly. Any way, perhaps, there is just very few things dat interest me about which I can write on. I struggle about writing or having opinion on things I dont really view as important. So, dunno, if you just dont feel like writing long text, then you dont, and there not much to do about it. Try to just write about wats interesting to you and it will just play itself out. Though, if you are demoralized by bullying then it can be harder to express your thoughts, and in this case, well, lets just say dat psychologists also consider reasons of the bully and the group…

  No. 298682 [PM]

File: 1789463291008-0.png (379.13 KB, 2250x2250, g_14770085 - 29189d8d2b38e….png)

>>298681
I guess familiarity with people you write to has biggest importance. If you talk with someone who you are just familiar or understand in some way, then you kinda feel more free to assume more stuff. Especially when this someone doesnt try to establish a distance and kinda just okay with it it

Groups also work like this. They kinda just let people in if they feel like they understand or familiar with the someone. Groups, just like people, dont like contrarisnism or opposition, so there are conditions on inclusion

But sometimes, people are just cruel. Some people just like laughing at other people and feel nothing wrong about it, because it is people in a society and not something personal. At least I cant better explain it

Any way, I guess all I can say is just do your thing. Try to change if you think itll help, but you cant change temperament and disposition



[Return] [Go to top] [Catalog] [Post a Reply]
Delete Post [ ]
[ home ] [ bs / meta / archive / spook ] [ dashboard ]

- Tinyboard + vichan 5.1.4 -
Tinyboard Copyright © 2010-2014 Tinyboard Development Group
vichan Copyright © 2012-2018 vichan-devel

All trademarks, copyrights, comments, and images on this page are owned by and are the responsibility of their respective parties.


Private Messages (Inbox & Outbox)
Please enter your password above and click "Sign In" to access your messages.
New Message to #